BackStartups

Angel legends

The cheques everyone quotes, checked

Famous angel investments accumulate legend faster than they accumulate documentation. These 9 are the ones where the facts hold up — what was actually invested, what was actually received, where the sources disagree, and what a small cheque can genuinely take from any of it.

9
Investments, sourced
5
Lessons drawn from them
0
"Worth today" figures

How this section is written

Every figure here is traceable to published reporting, linked on the page it appears on. Where credible outlets disagree — and on Mike Markkula's Apple investment they disagree three ways — we say so instead of picking the most quotable number.

We do not state what a stake is worth today. Those figures move with the share price and are stale the moment they are written, so returns here are anchored to a fixed event: the multiple at a listing, or the amount actually realised on a sale. And we treat "would be worth $X if he had held" as a fact about a decision rather than as a return anybody received.

The list is short and heavily American because the documented record is. That is a real limitation and we would rather state it than pad the section to look comprehensive.

Famous angel investments: common questions

What is the most famous angel investment ever made?
Andy Bechtolsheim's $100,000 cheque into Google in August 1998 is the most retold, partly because it was written to a company that had not yet been incorporated. Peter Thiel's $500,000 for 10.2% of Facebook in 2004 and SoftBank's $20m into Alibaba in 2000 are the other two most cited.
How much did the famous angel investors actually make?
Less than the headline figures suggest, and in some cases far less than they could have. Thiel realised a reported $1bn on Facebook by selling around the IPO — spectacular, and a fraction of what holding would have produced. We anchor every return to a fixed event rather than to a "worth today" figure that moves with the share price.
Can an ordinary angel repeat any of this?
The mechanics, yes — accumulating a position across rounds, negotiating a sensible entry price, writing a sell rule in advance. The outcomes, no, because they are the visible tail of a distribution whose failures were never written about. Both halves of that sentence matter.
Why is this list so short and so American?
Because the documented record is short and American. Angel investments outside the US are rarely reported in enough detail to state figures we can stand behind, and we would rather publish a short verified list than a long plausible one.

Read the other half

Every story here is a survivor

These investments were written about because they worked. The cheques the same people wrote into companies that returned nothing are almost entirely undocumented — which is why the failures deserve their own section, and why it is the more instructive one.