BackStartups

Post-mortems

Why startups die

The successes get written about because they worked, which makes them a badly biased sample. These 12 failures are the more instructive half — what actually went wrong, what was genuinely visible at the time, and which specific diligence check would have surfaced it.

12
Companies
4
Causes of death
100%
Sourced and linked

How to read this section

Every page separates three things that usually get blurred together: what happened, what was visible at the time, and what you should do differently. The middle one is the point. Hindsight makes every failure look obvious, and a signals list that could only have been written afterwards is entertainment rather than education.

We also keep fraud separate from failure. Most companies here failed without anyone lying, and treating those founders as though they had would be both unfair and useless. The fraud pages state what was charged and proven, with dates — and note where a sentence has since been reduced, pardoned or commuted, because several have.

Finally, each page links to the diligence guide that would most likely have caught the problem. The failures are the argument for the checklists.

Startup failures: common questions

What is the most common reason startups fail?
Not fraud, which is rare and disproportionately reported. The ordinary causes are demand that was assumed rather than demonstrated, unit economics that got worse rather than better with scale, and a capital requirement that outlived the funding environment. All three are represented here.
Could investors really have seen these coming?
Some of them, yes — and the signals sections list only things that were genuinely observable at the time rather than hindsight dressed as foresight. Several of these failures were caused by events nobody could have forecast, and those pages say so.
Why does this section cover fraud separately?
Because failing and lying are different things and conflating them is unfair to a great many founders. The fraud pages describe what was actually charged and proven in court, with dates, and note where sentences have since been reduced, pardoned or commuted.
Are failure stories actually useful to an angel?
More useful than the success stories, which are a survivorship-biased sample of a distribution. A failure tells you which specific check would have surfaced the problem, and that transfers directly to the next company you assess.

Put it to work

Failures are the argument for checklists

Almost every problem on these pages was findable with a question somebody did not ask. The diligence desk is that set of questions, organised by stage and by sector.