BackStartups

Book · How it goes wrong

Number Go Up

Zeke Faux · 2023

A reporter's sceptical tour of the crypto boom, arriving at FTX from the outside and asking the questions the insiders did not.

Why it is here

Faux spent the boom trying to establish whether the assets underlying the industry's largest claims actually existed, and reporting what he found when the answers were evasive. The method is unglamorous and it is exactly what diligence is.

The instructive contrast is with Going Infinite. One author had unparalleled access and produced a portrait many found credulous; the other had none and simply kept asking who was holding the assets. The second approach aged better, which is a finding about method rather than about either writer.

It is also very funny, which matters more than it should on a shelf this bleak.

Read it if

You want to see sceptical reporting used as a diligence method, on a subject where it was vindicated.

Skip it if

You have no interest in crypto — though the method transfers completely.

Pair it withGoing InfiniteMichael LewisMichael Lewis inside FTX before and during its collapse — a contested book that is more useful for what it demonstrates than for what it argues.

Number Go Up: common questions

Do I need to care about crypto to get value from this?
No. The transferable content is the method: keep asking a simple question — where are the assets, who is holding them, can I see them — and treat evasion as an answer. That works in any sector.
Why recommend it alongside Going Infinite?
Because the pair is a controlled experiment in access. One author was inside and one was outside, and the outsider's account has held up better. That comparison is more instructive than either book alone.