BackStartups

Cap table & dilution

Fully diluted

A share count that includes everything capable of becoming a share — issued shares, all options whether granted or merely reserved, warrants, and every outstanding convertible instrument.

In plain English

Fully diluted is the only honest basis on which to state ownership, because it counts the claims on the company rather than just the paperwork that has been completed. A company with 1,000,000 shares issued, a 200,000-share option pool and $1m of SAFEs outstanding does not have 1,000,000 shares in any meaningful sense.

The components are: issued and outstanding shares of every class; options granted and not yet exercised; options reserved in the pool and not yet granted; warrants, typically from venture debt or as sweeteners; and convertible instruments — SAFEs, notes and ASAs — modelled at their conversion terms.

The last of these is where practice diverges. Convertibles do not have a fixed share count until they convert, because the number depends on the price of a round that has not happened. Some cap tables therefore exclude them, which is defensible bookkeeping and misleading economics. The right treatment is to model them at the expected round price and show the result explicitly.

Percentages quoted on a non-fully-diluted basis are always higher and always flattering. When a founder tells you a number, the useful follow-up is one word: "diluted?"

What it means for your cheque

Insist on fully diluted for everything: your percentage, the founders' percentage, and the price per share in any priced round. A price calculated on issued shares alone is a lower price per share and therefore more shares for the investor — which sounds good until you realise the same treatment applies to whoever comes next.

The practical test for whether a company has a real grip on this is to ask for the fully diluted count with the convertibles modelled at a stated assumed round price. Founders who can produce it in a day are running a tight ship. Founders who have never done it will often discover something uncomfortable in the process, and you will both be better informed.

Do the arithmetic

The same stake on three different denominators

You hold 50,000 shares. The company has 1,000,000 shares issued, a 200,000-share option pool of which 120,000 is granted, and $800,000 of SAFEs that will convert into roughly 180,000 shares.

Issued shares only50,000 ÷ 1,000,000 = 5.00%
Including granted options50,000 ÷ 1,120,000 = 4.46%
Including the whole pool50,000 ÷ 1,200,000 = 4.17%
Fully diluted with SAFEs modelled50,000 ÷ 1,380,000 = 3.62%
Difference between the best and worst framing1.38 percentage points, or 28% of your position

All four numbers are arithmetically correct and only the last one is useful. When someone quotes a percentage without specifying the basis, they have not given you information.

At the table

What to negotiate

  • Specify "fully diluted, including the unissued pool and all outstanding convertibles" whenever a percentage is discussed.
  • For a priced round, confirm the price per share was calculated on the fully diluted count — this is what determines what your money buys.
  • Ask for the assumed conversion price used to model outstanding convertibles, and sanity-check it.
  • Check whether warrants exist. Venture debt facilities issue them routinely and they are easy to leave off a spreadsheet.
  • Ask about promised-but-ungranted equity to advisers, which appears on no schedule and is real all the same.

Fully diluted: common questions

Should the unissued option pool be counted?
Yes, in any fully diluted calculation. Those shares are reserved and will be issued; excluding them overstates every existing holder's percentage. It is the standard convention in venture and acquirers apply it too.
How are SAFEs counted when their conversion price is unknown?
By modelling them at an assumed round price, or at their cap where the cap is likely to bind. State the assumption on the cap table. The alternative — leaving them out — produces a number that is precisely wrong rather than approximately right.
Why do founders quote non-diluted percentages?
Usually because the simpler number is the one in their head and the convertibles genuinely are not shares yet. It is rarely deliberate. The remedy is to ask for the basis rather than to assume bad faith.