BackStartups

Book · How it actually went

Shoe Dog

Phil Knight · 2016

The Nike founder on two decades of near-insolvency — a company-building memoir that happens to contain the best available account of working capital as an existential problem.

Why it is here

This is not a technology book and that is why it is here. It describes a business that spent years technically insolvent, funding growth on credit it could barely service, in an industry with no venture capital and no tolerance for losses.

The relevance to an angel is a corrective. A great deal of startup writing treats cash as an abstraction between funding rounds; this describes what it is actually like when the money genuinely might not arrive, over and over, for twenty years.

It is also unusually well written for a founder memoir, which is a low bar that most clear by a smaller margin than this one.

Read it if

You want to understand company building outside the venture model.

Skip it if

You are looking for anything tactical — this is a memoir, not a manual.

Pair it withThe Everything StoreBrad StoneA reported history of Amazon's first two decades, written by a journalist rather than a participant.

Shoe Dog: common questions

Why is a shoe company on an angel investing list?
Because it describes building a business without venture capital, funded on credit, permanently close to insolvency. That is a useful corrective to writing which treats cash as an abstraction between rounds.
Is it useful or just enjoyable?
Mostly enjoyable, and genuinely useful on one thing: what a chronic cash constraint does to decision-making over years rather than months. Most founders you back will experience a version of it.