BackStartups

Book · How it actually went

The Everything Store

Brad Stone · 2013

A reported history of Amazon's first two decades, written by a journalist rather than a participant.

Why it is here

The value here is that it is reported rather than authorised. Company histories written with the company's cooperation tend toward the tidy narrative; this one includes the decisions that looked wrong at the time, the ones that were wrong, and the internal cost of the ones that worked.

For an angel the useful thread is the sustained tolerance for low margins and long payback in service of a position that would only become obvious much later. It is a study in what a genuinely long time horizon looks like operationally, as opposed to rhetorically.

Read it alongside Working Backwards, which describes the same company's internal mechanics from the inside, and note where the two accounts do not agree.

Read it if

You want an independently reported account of how a very large company was actually built.

Skip it if

You have limited time and would rather read about companies at the stage you invest in.

Pair it withWorking BackwardsColin Bryar & Bill CarrTwo long-serving Amazon executives on the company's internal mechanisms — the six-page memo, the written narrative, the working-backwards product process.

The Everything Store: common questions

Why prefer a journalist's account to a founder's?
Because authorised histories tend to resolve into a tidy narrative in which every decision was deliberate. Reported accounts keep the mistakes, the internal disagreements and the decisions that were right for the wrong reasons.
What is the investor-relevant theme?
Time horizon as an operational reality rather than a slogan — years of thin margins and long payback in pursuit of a position that was not obvious to the market until much later.